The busy season

Fall is one of the busy periods of the year for me.

This week I am working with two handy “instruments”.  One is the Bayley III Child Observation Inventory and the other is the standard, reliable genogram.

The Bayley makes it possible to assess children almost from birth to four years.  It is a sort of overall developmental health or progress survey that can be administered by parents, teachers, caregivers – almost anyone in a controlled and guided setting with the Bayley tool kit.

Baley III

Each module comes with a series of detailed questions and tasks for the examiner to administer and some colorful props like plastic rings, cubes, balls, picture books, story books, shapes, crayons, pencils.  There are a number of modules and each has a pretty steep price point, otherwise parents could just buy them and use them at home to see how their kids stack up.

Baley tool set

Naturally some children excel in areas like fine motor skills but may lag in language or cognitive abilities.  In any case, it is easily adapted by picking up equivalent objects at a toy store and informally gauging how a little one is doing.  Of course, if one were to do this informally, it would have little diagnostic or prognostic value and should not be seen as a substitute for professional assessment if signs indicate that an evaluation is in order.

Bayley child

Nevertheless, it is just nice to know that a lot of research went into its development and it is a way to create a sort of developmental progress profile long before the Stanford Binet-type instruments for IQ and aptitude  would be appropriate.

For other reasons, the genogram, which has been around for decades, is an old fashioned diagrammatic standby.  It enables just about anyone to get a pictorial view of social dynamics, especially in families.  It has been used in many settings but is particularly useful in couples or family counseling.  The “person-centered” approach that has developed from the theories of Carl Rogers, views the psychological evolution of individuals as attempting to self-actualize.  When two or more individuals interact, that actualization is either enhanced, left neutral, or impeded.  This branch of psychology assumes that the inter-actors themselves, once they can recognize their needs and see how those needs interplay with the needs being acted out by others, can then be led to express them, which can be therapeutic for some people.

Genogram three

The genogram then allows those expressed needs to be visualized in a simple diagram, using standardized symbols.  Once that is done, the actions of each person are diagrammed and can be studied and discussed. The psychologist employing this technique, acts as a facilitator who gently steers the analysis and does not direct it.  In the process of creating a genogram of the individual’s feelings/actions and the interactions that take place above and below the surface, between those individuals, presumably greater empathy is developed.  The subjects ideally move from purely mental to emotional analysis and awareness.

So it works something like this.  Each person writes down his/her feelings at the moment (or for some delimited time period), usually just making a list.  The list should include the feelings that are overt and those that are covert.  In other words, what is above the surface and easily expressed, and what is below the surface and usually just felt or thought and not expressed.

Example: formal but simple genogram

The guide then makes a genogram (using standardised symbols and signs) on a white or blackboard, diagramming the two (or more) actors involved and listing underneath the symbol for that person (usually a square for males and a circle for females, with their first initial or name in the middle) one word summaries of the listed feelings and thoughts.  The guide draws a horizontal line across the page, a little below the two symbols. All the terms above the line are expressed, easy to observe.  Below the line are unexpressed, hidden feelings and thoughts.  Then the list is discussed and the guide continues to draw lines and arrows indicating the dynamics of the interactions between the subjects.  The simple act of diagramming feelings and thoughts and viewing them on a large vertical surface is revealing and hopefully leads to discussion and catharsis as each person gets a chance to give and receive feedback in a structured but evocative way.

Informal but complex genogram

Images: Pearson Clinical; Psychometrics.cam; Indiana.edu; Wikimedia Commons

POST A DAY 2013

5 Comments on “The busy season

  1. Worked a lot with genograms in graduate school; interesting stuff. Never heard of the other assessment but early childhood was never my focus. However it reminds me a little bit of a program developed by my SIL called “ready bodies learning minds.” I think she has a website somewhere; she’s been doing it for years and again, since EC isn’t my focus I’ve never delved into it too deeply.

    Like

    • Yeah, you would have little use for the Bayley – your SIL’s work sounds interesting! Genograms probably come in very handy for what you do. Faculty could diagram their interactions, too, if they were open to it, LOL.

      Like

It's your turn! I want to know what YOU think :-)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: